Sunday, March 15, 2009

Psychological Satisfaction

First off, I'd like to say hi. My name is Thomas, and as you know, I'll be helping out with the blog during the coming week. Since it's Sunday, I'm not going to be writing specifically about the Rangers, though my article definitely pertains to them.


This is the time of year when we all wait with bated breath for the upcoming season. We make our predictions, we analyze a young prospects chances of making the roster, we debate who will be the key players who contribute to the team's success, and we hope, even if we know our club is likely headed for the graveyard, that perhaps they will come away with a ring. There are always teams who the sports writers and commentators rave about before the season begins, and it seems they are usually the clubs with the highest payroll. Think back to last year with the Tigers and the Mets, two teams that were congested with star power. Those two teams didn't even make the playoffs, but even if they did, would you, if you happened to be a fan of either team, be truly satisfied?

One of the reasons I love baseball is that though we, the fans, do not contribute on the field, we still feel a sense of accomplishment when our team is successful. As I said, we don't contribute on the field, but we do contribute by attending games, watching them on TV, listening on the radio, studying stats, comparing numbers, and using our immense knowledge of the game to conduct a conversation with our fellow baseball aficionados. When our team finds success, we are rewarded for our hard work just as the players are. But now that our team has made the playoffs, we must look at how they got there. There are two ways: either the front office spent millions of dollars on an all star lineup, or they, partly due to a lack of money, worked their fingers to the bone, going through prospect after prospect until a young nucleus of players is ready to take the field and win. Obviously, the latter is much more difficult, but in my mind, it is the only way to find true satisfaction. Here's an analogy for greater understanding: If a man collected coins, or even better, baseball cards, there would be two ways that he could complete his collection. Either he could get his credit card and in a matter of minutes, order every card he needed to complete his collection, or he could spend a long amount of time to complete his collection by doing hard bargain hunting, making trades, and attending card shows, and in the end, save a lot of money. Now these are the two ways to complete a collection, and they're very similar to how a championship baseball team is constructed. Which one do you think would give a greater sense of satisfaction and accomplishment?

As you've probably guessed by now, this can relate to the Rangers and their current situation. It's obvious which path they have chosen to find success. Yes, it has taken a while to get star players like Chris Davis, Derek Holland, Elvis Andrus, and Matt Harrison, and yes, it has required a lot of patience, it has even made fans go spiral into confusion and let out frustration through rants and tantrums. But the effort gives the players, and the fans, a greater sense of satisfaction when success finally comes riding in. In the end, it is up to the fan to decide which route is better, but based on effort and psychological satisfaction, it is clear which one will give us true joy, because it seems that effort is what brings the true sense of accomplishment, not dollars.

(I'll make sure to write about Rangers baseball during the week. By the way, feel free to take a look at own blog in which I write about, of all things, film)

3 comments:

  1. Good stuff Thomas. You're right on, not only is building from within the more financially sound way to build a team, it's far more exciting and rewarding to watch these prospects as they make their way up the ladder. We've still got a ways to go with our young talent, but there's definitely light at the end of this tunnel - and I've got a feeling getting there is going to be almost equally as rewarding as once we arrive in that baseball promised land.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would agree, but I've got a few quick points.

    1) I have an issue with some semantics. Holland, Andrus etc are great PROSPECTS, and prospects are guys that haven't done it yet. Davis looked really good last year, lets see if it continues. These guys could be very good, but they also could fall flat on their faces and then what? You've got the washouts and nothing to show for it. It's a numbers game with that, but you can understand my argument. I've heard a theory they're rushing Andrus because JD needs to show the fans something from the Tex trade. There's more to it than that, but I think that's a very real point.

    The ideal way I tend to think is the Angels. They'll put up money and pay the free agents they need to complete the puzzle. They don't get gunshy when it doesn't work, but they have minor league depth too. Tom Hicks has a hell of a market in the DFW area (the largest market without 2 teams), don't tell me he can't pony up that money.

    Not a bad analogy though, I remember fondly my days of baseball cards.

    WC3

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting points will, though I'd have to say I disagree with the thought that Andrus is being rushed simply so JD can "have something to show" for the Tex trade. We've already got Matt Harrison locked into the rotation from that trade, and Salty is once again generating a fair amount of hype - plus, by all accounts Andrus is expected to struggle in his rapid ascent to the bigs this year, so I'm not sure that line of thinking even makes sense.

    If there's a PR reason for Andrus rapid ascent, I would think it probably has more to do with the hoopla it took to pry Michael Young and his lead feet from shortstop - it would've been a lot harder to justify that move to the average fan who knows Young as the face of the ballclub if they where just going to run a stopgap shortstop out there until 2010. Ultimately I think it's about the defensive value Andrus provides though, and the fact that Joaquin Arias didn't look like a viable option to even be a placeholder at short until these past couple weeks.

    ReplyDelete